To Jupiter And Beyond

On An Exploratory Mission With JUnit Pioneer

Nicolai Parlog

nipafx.dev / @nipafx

Global Summit for Java Devs

@GeekleOfficial

Developer Advocate

Java Team at Oracle

JUnit Pioneer

JUnit Pioneer — junit-pioneer.org:

provides extensions for JUnit 5 and its Jupiter API
small project (10.6k lines of code, 4 maintainers)

Why is it interesting?

JUnit 5 is thrilling
grew a (small) community on Twitch
neat build and Git practices
one-click releases
automatic website build

JUnit 5 and its extension model
Pioneer’s extensions, mission, and history
how live-streaming grew a community
organizational style and contribution guide
architecture and dependency management
building with quality control and
on multiple Java/JUnit versions and OS
one-click releases
website build

JUnit Extensions

Crash course to JUnit 5 and
its extension model.

(This is very incomplete!
More in the user guide or this article.)

JUnit 5

A simple test:

class JUnit5Test {

	@Test
	void test() {
		assertTrue(true);
	}

}

need an API to write tests against
need an engine that executes them

Separation Of Concerns

Separation of concerns in JUnit 5:

an API to write tests against
an API to discover and run tests
1. specific engine per variant of tests
  (e.g. JUnit 4 or JUnit 5)
2. orchestration of engines
3. API between them

Architecture

JUnit Jupiter

defines test API
defines extension API
contains engine for them

Often referred to as "JUnit 5".

Extension Model

Jupiter allows seamless extensions:

@Test
@DisabledOnFriday
void failingTest() {
	assertTrue(false);
}

Cornerstones:

extensions interact with extension points
extensions must be registered
(possibly with annotations)

Extension Points

An incomplete list:

instance post processor
@BeforeAll and @BeforeEach
execution condition
exception handling
@AfterEach and @AfterAll

Each represented by an interface,
e.g. ExecutionCondition.

Extension Example

How to disable tests on Friday:

public class DisabledOnFridayCondition
		implements ExecutionCondition {

	@Override
	public ConditionEvaluationResult evaluate(/**/) {
		if (isFriday())
			return ConditionEvaluationResult
				.disabled("Weekend! 🕺🏾💃🏼");
		else
			return ConditionEvaluationResult
				.enabled("Run the test 😬");
	}

}

Registering Annotations

Jupiter is aware of meta annotations.
⇝ We can create our own annotations!

// [... more annotations ...]
@ExtendWith(DisabledOnFridayCondition.class)
public @interface DisabledOnFriday { }

@Test
@DisabledOnFriday
void failingTest() {
	assertTrue(false);
}

Pioneer Extensions

An incomplete list:

Cartesian products for parameters
set default locale
set system properties
publish issue information
retry failed tests

Let’s see some incomplete examples!

Cartesian Product

@CartesianProductTest
@CartesianValueSource(ints = { 1, 2 })
@CartesianValueSource(strings = { "A", "B" })
void test(int number, String character) {
    // called four times - with:
	// (1, "A") (1, "B") (2, "A") (2, "B")
}

Default Locale

@Test
@DefaultLocale(language = "en")
void test() {
    assertThat(Locale.getDefault())
        .isEqualTo(new Locale("en"));
}

System Properties

@Test
@ClearSystemProperty(key = "user.name")
@SetSystemProperty(key = "user.dir", value = "...")
void test() {
    assertThat(System.getProperty("user.name"))
		.isNull();
    assertThat(System.getProperty("user.dir"))
		.isEqualTo("...");
}

Issue Information

Mark tests that belong to issues:

@Test
@Issue("REQ-123")
void test() {
    // a test for the issue "REQ-123"
}

Process information after execution:

Retrying Tests

@RetryingTest(3)
void test() {
    // if 1st, 2nd, or 3rd execution passes,
	// the test passes; otherwise fails
}

Others

We have a few more:

ranges for parameters
set default time zone
set environment variables
disable specific parameterized tests
publish report entries
mocking standard I/O

Isn’t this all a bit random?

⇝ Yes!

JUnit Pioneer

Mission statement:

JUnit Pioneer provides extensions for JUnit 5 and its Jupiter API. It does not limit itself to proven ideas with wide application but is purposely open to experiments. It aims to spin off successful and cohesive portions into sibling projects or back into the JUnit 5 code base.

JUnit Pioneer

We want to:

provide helpful extensions
be open to experimental ideas
catch-all extensions that are too small
to be their own project

JUnit Pioneer

We are:

Matthias Bünger — Bishuemaster
Mihály Verhás — Chief Developer
Nicolai Parlog — Benevolent Dictator
Simon Schottner — Build Engineer

Plus about a dozen contribtors,
some of them recurring.

JUnit Pioneer

We have:

4.7k lines of production code
5.9k lines of test code
26 releases, 5 since 1.0.0
Java 8 as requirement
Java 9-15 supported

How did we get here?

Sounds good? Not so fast!

this is a hobby project
life gets in the way
for 3 years, little happened

Wait, Magic?

Twitch

2019

Nicolai discovers Twitch
does a few live streams in spring
decides to stream regularly in December

2020

30 JUnit Pioneer streams
usually 3 to 5 hours

Twitch

Expected effects:

commits Nicolai to ~10 h/month for Pioneer
interests Java devs

Twitch

Unexpected effects:

gives viewers insight into project
viewers help in their areas of expertise
- in Twitch chat
- on GitHub
viewers pick up small issues
viewers become contributors
contributors become maintainers

Twitch

Thanks to live-streaming, we became a small community.

In November 2020, we got together for donations:

Twitch sub money + individual donations
570 EUR to Climate Action Fund and DKMS

When the pandemic is over,
we’ll finally meet for drinks.

🍺🍹🥛🥃

Twitch

Thanks to live-streaming, this one-man show,
became a real project:

in April 2020, Simon and Matthias
became maintainers
in November 2020, Mihaly joined

A few contributors also stop by the stream
(and always enjoy when Nicolai reviews their PRs).

Project Management

communication & prioritization
doing the dirty work
fostering contributions
managing expectations

Contributing Without Coding

Once a repo turns into a project,
project management becomes essential.

There’s plenty of ways of
contributing without coding.

These contributions are often
more important than code.

Contributing Without Coding

curating issues
- creating, labeling, replying, closings
- prioritizing, organizing
reviewing PRs
- technical merits
- completeness
following up on uncomfortable tasks
remembering/updating documentation

Dirty work

Coding is fun! Cleaning up (often) isn’t.

As a maintainer:

fix bugs first
tackle the hard issues
(annotations, threading, merge conflicts)
set up build pipeline, releases,
documentation, website, etc.

We created milestone Cleaner Pioneers for that.

Preparing 1.0

Spring 2020 we started thinking about 1.0,
but Pioneer has no cohesive feature set.

⇝ there’s no good point for 1.0

Instead, prepare everything for users and contributors.

⇝ Cleaner Pioneers became 1.0

Since Then

Pioneer still has no cohesive feature set
all must-dos are done (for the time being)

⇝ Milestone is wrong concept.

So now we use a Kanban board
(via GitHub’s Projects feature).

Pull Requests

Noteworthy details about PRs:

checklist
approval
squash & merge

Approving Pull Requests

Two maintainers need to approve a PR.

Lack of trust?
No, sharing responsibility.

(More on that later.)

Squashing Commits

When a PR is ready to be merged:

all commits are squashed into one
commit message is carefully crafted
that commit goes onto main

Squashing Commits

"But don’t you loose the history?"

Yes!

lets contributors use Git however they like
keeps commit history clean
leads to really good commit messages
(prepared as part of the PR)

Fostering Contributions

appreciation
contribution guide
explicit rules
(preferably simple)

Appreciation

We’re appreciative:

positive tone
prioritize replies
thank for contributions,
excuse delays
list contributions

Contribution Guide

We have a (very long) CONTRIBUTING.md:

describes all aspects in detail
binds maintainers and contributors
grew organically over time
(more in a few slides)

Protecting Maintainers

There’s no expectation of availability! This applies to users opening issues, contributors providing PRs, and other maintainers - none of them can expect a maintainer to have time to reply to their request.

Sharing Responsibility

Struggle for newest maintainers:

first open source project
project pre-existed
worried to break things

Solution:

two maintainers sign off PRs
Nicolai is the benevolent dictator

Benevolent Dictator

Nicolai has special…

privilege — can overrule anything
duty — should’ve prevented all mistakes

Writes Nicolai:

I bare responsibility for all mistakes. (Moral responsibility, that is - legally, nobody has any responsibility. 😉)

Project Management

As you can see, quite a lof of
project and team management.

Many ways to contribute without coding.

Coding

architecture
dependency management
how to test a test framework

Architecture

JUnit Pioneer has high-end architecture:

📦 org.junitpioneer
├─ 📦 internal  # our utilities - internal
├─ 📦 jupiter   # most of our extensions
│  ├─ 📦 issue  # issue impl - internal
│  └─ 📦 params # ext. re parameterized tests
└─ 📦 vintage   # ext. re to JUnit 4

We mirror Jupiter’s packages:

org.junit.jupiter.api
org.junit.jupiter.params

Internal packages

Speaking of internal packages:

we created two (e.g. for annotations)
we don’t want people to use them

How?

⚠️ one package is called internal
⚠️ package info says it’s internal
🛑 we ship modular JAR that
doesn’t export these packages

Dependency Management

Projects have enough problems
with dependencies.

We don’t want to add to that.

⇝ JUnit 5 should be our only
runtime dependency.

In Practice

The @Issue extension:

collects information about tests
wants to create a report

But reports could be XML, JSON, etc.

"need" dependencies for that
probably not many users use @Issue

What now?

Resolution

Dependency inversion to the rescue
(via Java’s ServiceLoader):

Pioneer declares interface IssueProcessor
users implement it and register implementation
Pioneer finds implementations and passes info

Tests²

How do you test a test framework?

want to verify error behavior
want to test behavior outside of tests
(e.g. report entry publication)

We often write tests that run other tests
and then evaluate their results.

Tests²

JUnit 5 has good support for that:

we added a few usability methods
we created our own assertions

ExecutionResults results = executeTestMethod(
	MethodLevelInitializationFailureTestCase.class,
	"shouldFailMissingConfiguration");
assertThat(results)
	.hasSingleFailedTest()
	.withExceptionInstanceOf(/*...*/);

Tests²

Thread safety:

all our extensions should be thread-safe
to test that, we run our tests in parallel
that’s not always fun

We’re mostly sure, we got this. 😬

Building

quality control
compatibility
one-click releases
website build

Build Pipeline

build project with Gradle (Kotlin style)
trigger build on commit with GitHub Actions
kick off release build on GitHub
trigger website build

Quality Control

Code style:

we want a uniform code style
we don’t want to manually
discuss or enforce it

So we let Spotless and Checkstyle
break the build on violations.

Quality Control

Code quality:

we want to avoid pitfalls and gotchas
we want high test coverage
we know better than any tool 😁

We use SonarQube
to analyze and report.

Version Control

Build against:

range of operating systems
range of Java versions
as module and not
range of JUnit versions

All with GitHub Actions.

One-Click Releases

Manually dispatched workflow
on GitHub Actions:

Kicks of Gradle release build.

One-Click Releases

In release build, Gradle uses Shipkit to:

detect next version
build artifacts
upload to Bintray (with Bintray plugin)
create Git tag
create GitHub release with changelog

Website build

Last step triggers website build:

pulls in all projects
builds website with docs
pulls version(s) from files
builds website with Jekyll

That was JUnit Pioneer

From code to community, from planning to building
we hope you saw something interesting!

To follow up:

So long…

37% off with
code fccparlog

bit.ly/the-jms

Slides at slides.nipafx.dev
⇜ Get my book!

Follow Nicolai

nipafx.dev
/nipafx

Follow Java

inside.java
/java // /openjdk

To Jupiter And Beyond

On An Exploratory Mission With JUnit Pioneer

JUnit Pioneer

Table of Contents

JUnit Extensions

JUnit 5

Separation Of Concerns

Architecture

JUnit Jupiter

Extension Model

Extension Points

Extension Example

Registering Annotations

Pioneer Extensions

Cartesian Product

Default Locale

System Properties

Issue Information

Retrying Tests

Others

JUnit Pioneer

JUnit Pioneer

JUnit Pioneer

JUnit Pioneer

How did we get here?

Wait, Magic?

Twitch

Twitch

Twitch

Twitch

Twitch

Project Management

Contributing Without Coding

Contributing Without Coding

Dirty work

Preparing 1.0

Since Then

Pull Requests

Approving Pull Requests

Squashing Commits

Squashing Commits

Fostering Contributions

Appreciation

Contribution Guide

Protecting Maintainers

Sharing Responsibility

Benevolent Dictator

Project Management

Coding

Architecture

Internal packages

Dependency Management

In Practice

Resolution

Tests²

Tests²

Tests²

Building

Build Pipeline

Quality Control

Quality Control

Version Control

One-Click Releases

One-Click Releases

Website build

That was JUnit Pioneer

So long…​

More

Follow Nicolai

Follow Java

Image Credits

So long…