module A {
requires B;
}
I assume you know the JPMS basics
there’s much to talk about
⇝ this is only about "advanced" JPMS features
slides at slides.codefx.org
Modules
have a unique name
express their dependencies
export specific packages
and hide the rest
These information
are defined in module-info.java
get compiled to module-info.class
end up in JAR root folder
Modules express dependencies
with requires
clauses:
module A {
requires B;
}
module system checks all dependencies
(⇝ reliable configuration)
lets module read its dependencies
Modules export packages
with exports
clauses
module B {
exports p;
}
Code in module A can only access Type
in module B if:
Type
is public
Type
is in an exported package
A reads B
(⇝ strong encapsulation)
Find it on GitHub!
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<SurpriseFactory> factories = asList(
new ChocolateFactory(), new QuoteFactory());
Calendar cal = Calendar.create(factories);
println(cal.asText());
}
module surprise {
// requires no other modules
exports org.codefx.advent.surprise;
}
module calendar {
requires surprise;
exports org.codefx.advent.calendar;
}
module factories {
requires surprise;
exports org.codefx.advent.factories;
}
module advent {
requires calendar;
requires factories;
requires surprise;
}
# compile all modules at once
$ javac -d classes
--module-source-path "src"
--module advent
# package one by one, eventually advent
$ jar --create
--file mods/advent.jar
--main-class advent.Main
${*.class}
# launch the application
$ java --module-path mods --module advent
Transitive Dependencies |
Optional Dependencies |
Services |
Qualified Exports |
Reflective Access |
Transitive Dependencies |
Optional Dependencies |
Services |
Qualified Exports |
Reflective Access |
Not all dependencies are created equal:
most are used within a module
some are used on the boundary
between modules
Transitive dependencies are about the latter.
Example in calendar exposing surprise:
public static Calendar create(
List<SurpriseFactory> factories) {
// ...
}
⇝ Module calendar is unusable without surprise!
How can users of exposing module
determine required dependencies?
Try and error?
No!
Exposing module can mark dependencies
on exposed modules with
requires transitive
:
module A {
requires transitive B;
}
A reads B as usual
modules reading A will read B
without having to require it
⇝ A implies readability of B
Applied to the advent calendar:
module calendar {
requires transitive surprise;
// ...
}
Implied readability is surprisingly versatile
aggregator modules
splitting modules up
even merging modules
renaming modules
Making it easier to consume
calendar, factories, surprise:
module adventcalendar {
requires transitive calendar;
requires transitive factories;
requires transitive surprise;
}
If factories gets split into
api, chocolate, and quotes:
module factories {
requires transitive factory.api;
requires transitive factory.chocolate;
requires transitive factory.quotes;
}
If calendar, factories, surprise
are merged into adventcalendar:
module calendar {
requires transitive adventcalendar;
}
module factories {
requires transitive adventcalendar;
}
module surprise {
requires transitive adventcalendar;
}
Careful: Users suddenly depend on a large module!
If factories becomes surprisefactories:
module factories {
requires transitive surprisefactories;
}
With A requires transitive B
:
A reads B
any module reading A reads B
Applications:
make API usable without further dependencies
aggregator modules
splitting, merging, renaming modules
More at codefx.org:
Transitive Dependencies |
Optional Dependencies |
Services |
Qualified Exports |
Reflective Access |
Not all dependencies are equally required:
some are needed for a module to function
some can be absent and code adapts
some are only needed to enhance
another module’s features
Optional dependencies are about the latter two.
Use case:
a library may be absent from some deployments
code is aware and does not call absent modules
Example:
each SurpriseFactory
implementation
has its own module
advent works without any specific factory
Use case:
a project may provide usability functions
for other libraries
such code will not be called if library modules
are absent
Example:
hypothetical library uber-lib
provides usability functions for various libraries
With what we know so far:
for code to compile against another module
that module has to be required
a required module has to be present
at launch time
⇝ If a module’s types are used
it has to be present at run time
(Reliable configuration!)
Dependency can be marked requires static
:
module A {
requires static B;
}
at compile time: A requires B as usual
at run time:
if B is present, A reads B
otherwise, app can launch
but access to B can fail
For advent and the two factories:
module advent {
requires calendar;
requires surprise;
requires static factory.chocolate;
requires static factory.quote;
}
Checking whether module is present:
Optional<SurpriseFactory> createChocolateFactory() {
if (isModulePresent("factory.chocolate"))
return Optional.of(new ChocolateFactory());
else
return Optional.empty();
}
For uber-lib:
module uber.lib {
requires static com.google.guava;
requires static org.apache.commons.lang;
requires static io.vavr;
requires static com.aol.cyclops;
}
Assumptions:
nobody calls into Guava part without using Guava
no runtime checks necessary
With A requires static B
:
at compile time: A requires B as usual
at runtime: B may be absent
Two kinds of applications:
modules with code adapting to absence
utility libraries that aren’t called
without that dependency
More at codefx.org:
Transitive Dependencies |
Optional Dependencies |
Services |
Qualified Exports |
Reflective Access |
Consumers and implementations
of an API should be decoupled.
Service locator pattern:
service registry as central arbiter
implementors inform registry
consumers call registry to get implementations
In the JPMS:
modules declare which services they use
modules declare which services they provide
ServiceLoader
is the registry
code can interact with it to load services
Module declarations:
// consumer
module A {
uses some.Service;
}
// provider
module B {
provides some.Service
with some.Type;
}
A never "sees" providers like B
module system picks up all providers
A can get providers from ServiceLoader
ServiceLoader.load(Service.class)
module advent {
requires calendar;
uses surprise.SurpriseFactory;
}
module factory.chocolate {
requires surprise;
provides surprise.SurpriseFactory
with factory.quote.ChocolateFactory;
}
module factory.quote {
requires surprise;
provides surprise.SurpriseFactory
with factory.quote.QuoteFactory;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<SurpriseFactory> factories = ServiceLoader
.load(SurpriseFactory.class).stream()
.map(Provider::get)
.collect(toList());
Calendar cal = Calendar.create(factories);
System.out.println(cal.asText());
}
To decouple API consumers and providers:
consumer uses Service
provider provides Service with Impl
Module system is service locator;
request implementations from ServiceLoader
:
ServiceLoader.load(Service.class)
Transitive Dependencies |
Optional Dependencies |
Services |
Qualified Exports |
Reflective Access |
So far, exported packages are visible
to every reading module.
What if a set of modules wants to share code?
Similar to utility classes:
if class should be visible outside of package,
it has to be public ⇝ visible to everybody
if package should be visible outside of module,
it has to be exported ⇝ visible to everybody
Module system fixes the former.
What about the latter?
module A {
exports some.pack to B;
}
B can access some.pack
as if regularly exported
other modules can not access it
as if not exported at all
To ease implementation of SurpriseFactory
:
create new module factory
add class AbstractSurpriseFactory
export that package only to
factory implementation modules
module factory {
requires transitive surprise;
exports factory
to factory.chocolate, factory.quote;
}
With A exports pack to B
:
only B can access types in some.pack
other modules behave as if some.pack
is not exported
Use to share sensible code between modules.
Transitive Dependencies |
Optional Dependencies |
Services |
Qualified Exports |
Reflective Access |
Exporting a package makes it public API:
modules can compile code against it
clients expect it to be stable
What if a type is only meant
to be accessed via reflection?
(Think Spring, Hibernate, etc.)
module A {
opens some.pack;
}
at compile time:
types in some.pack
are not accessible
at run time:
all types and members in some.pack
are accessible
A qualified variant (opens to
) exists.
open module A {
// no more `opens` clauses
}
The same as open packages
but for all of them!
With open modules or open packages:
code can be made accessible
at run time only
particularly valuable to open
for reflection
Use to make types available for reflection
without making them public API.
The module system is pretty strict but…
… not all modules are well-designed
… not all use cases were intended
What to do then?
Command line options to the rescue!
(I often call them "escape hatches".)
All command line flags can be applied
to javac
and java
!
When used during compilation,
they do not change the resulting
module descriptor!
If a module is not required,
it might not make it into the module graph.
Help it get there with --add-modules
:
$ java --module-path mods
# --add-modules <module>(,<module>)*
--add-modules java.xml.ws.annotation
--module advent
JavaEE modules are not resolved by default!
java.activation
java.corba
java.transaction
java.xml.bind
java.xml.ws
java.xml.ws.annotation
They need to be added with --add-modules
!
Maybe a module in the graph is not readable
by another but you need it to be.
Add readability edges with --add-reads
:
$ java --module-path mods
# --add-reads <module>=<target>(,<more>)*
--add-reads advent=factories
--module advent
A common case:
A module needs types that
the owning module doesn’t export.
Export them with --add-exports
:
$ java --module-path mods
# --add-exports <module>/<package>=<target>
--add-exports factories/factory.quotes=advent
--module advent
Use target ALL-UNNAMED
to export to all modules.
Another common case:
A module reflects on types from a package that
the owning module doesn’t open.
Open packages with add-opens
:
$ java --module-path mods
# --add-opens <module>/<package>=<target>
--add-opens factories/factory.quotes=advent
--module advent
Use target ALL-UNNAMED
to open to all modules.
(It is not possible to open an entire module.)
Maybe you have a package split…
Mend it with --patch-module
:
$ java --module-path mods
--add-modules java.xml.ws.annotation
# --patch-module <module>=<JAR>
--patch-module java.xml.ws.annotation=jsr305.jar
--module advent
All classes from jsr305.jar
are put
into java.xml.ws.annotation.
By putting JAR content into a module A:
split packages can be mended
A needs to read JAR’s dependencies,
which need to export used packages
modules using JAR content need to read A
and A needs to export used packages
Often used with --add-reads
and --add-exports
.
Edit module graph with:
--add-modules
to add modules
--add-reads
to add readability edges
--add-exports
to export packages to modules
--add-opens
to open packages to modules
--patch-module
to add classes to module
The latter two accept ALL-UNNAMED
as target.
More at codefx.org:
most module systems are "in or out",
but modularized JDK and legacy JARs
have to cooperate!
there is a boundary between
legacy and modules
Incremental modularization means
moving that boundary.
Incremental modularization is enabled by two features:
Unnamed Module(s)
Automatic Modules
And the fact that module and class path coexist:
modular JARs can be put on either
"regular" JARs can be put on either
The Unnamed Module
contains all JARs on the class path
(including modular JARs).
has no name (surprise!)
can read all modules
exports all packages
Inside the unnamed module
"the chaos of the class path" lives on.
Put all your JARs on the class path.
what if your code was modularized?
and your dependencies were not?
proper modules can not depend on
"the chaos on the class path"
this is not possible:
module advent {
requires unnamed;
}
An Automatic Module
is created for each "regular" JAR
on the module path.
name defined by manifest entry
AUTOMATIC-MODULE-NAME
or
derived from JAR name
can read all modules
(including the Unnamed Module)
exports all packages
put guava-19.0.jar
on the module path
then this works:
module advent {
requires guava;
}
Class Path | Module Path | |
---|---|---|
Regular JAR | Unnamed Module | Automatic Module |
Modular JAR | Unnamed Module | Explicit Module |
Unnamed or named module?
The user decides, not the maintainer!
Three strategies emerge:
bottom-up
top-down
inside-out
Works best for projects without
unmodularized dependencies
(libraries).
turn project JARs into modules
they still work on the class path
clients can move them to the module path
whenever they want
Required for projects with
unmodularized dependencies
(applications).
turn project JARs into modules
modularized dependencies:
require direct ones
put all on the module path
unmodularized dependencies:
require direct ones with automatic name
put direct ones on the module path
put others on the class path
When dependencies get modularized:
hopefully the name didn’t change
if they are already on the module path,
nothing changes
otherwise move them there
check their dependencies
What about published projects with
unmodularized dependencies
(libraries)?
top-down mostly works
but there’s an important detail
about automatic module names!
automatic module name may
be based on JAR name
file names can differ
across build environments
module name can change
when project gets modularized
⇝ Such automatic module names are unstable.
dependencies might require the same
module by different names
the module system does not support that
there is no way to launch that application!
⇝ Do not publish modules
that depend on automatic modules
whose names are based on file names!
thanks to manifest entry,
projects can publish their module name
assumption is that it won’t change
when project gets modularized
that makes these names stable
⇝ It is ok to publish modules
that depend on automatic modules
whose names are based on manifest entry.
a command line tool
analyzes bytecode to
detect dependencies
exists since Java 8
really shines with modules
$ jdeps sh-2.6.3.jar
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> java.base
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> java.datatransfer
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> java.desktop
# ... truncated more module dependencies ...
> edu.udo.sh -> com.beust.jcommander not found
> edu.udo.sh -> edu.udo.sh.data sh-2.6.3.jar
> edu.udo.sh -> edu.udo.sh.gui sh-2.6.3.jar
> edu.udo.sh -> edu.udo.sh.gui.util sh-2.6.3.jar
> edu.udo.sh -> edu.udo.sh.util sh-2.6.3.jar
> edu.udo.sh -> java.io java.base
> edu.udo.sh -> java.lang java.base
> edu.udo.sh -> javax.swing java.desktop
# ... truncated many more package dependencies ...
$ jdeps
--class-path 'libs/*' -recursive
sh-2.6.3.jar
# ... truncated split package warnings ...
# ... truncated some module/JAR dependencies...
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> libs/commons-codec-1.6.jar
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> libs/commons-io-2.4.jar
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> libs/dom4j-1.6.1.jar
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> libs/exp4j-0.1.38.jar
> sh-2.6.3.jar -> libs/guava-18.0.jar
# ... truncated more module/JAR dependencies...
# ... truncated many, many package dependencies ...
$ jdeps
--class-path 'libs/*' -recursive
--dot-output dots
sh-2.6.3.jar
# sed -i 's/-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar//g' summary.dot
# sed -i '/java.base/d' summary.dot
$ dot -Tpng -O dots/summary.dot
$ jdeps
--class-path 'libs/*' -recursive
--jdk-internals
sh-2.6.3.jar
Create a JDK install with just the code you need:
know which modules your app uses (⇝ jdeps
)
create an image with those modules (⇝ jlink
)
This is about jlink
.
Create with jlink
$ jlink
# define output folder for the image
--output jdk
# where to find modules?
--module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods
# which modules to add (includes dependencies!)
--add-modules java.base
Try it out:
$ jdk/bin/java --list-modules
> java.base
Say you use JAX-WS, JAXP, JAXB, JDBC, and JUL:
$ jlink
--output jdk
--module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods
--add-modules java.xml.ws,java.xml,java.xml.bind
--add-modules java.sql,java.logging
$ jdk/bin/java --list-modules
> java.activation
> java.base
> java.compiler
> java.datatransfer
> java.desktop
> java.logging
> java.management
> java.prefs
> java.sql
> java.xml
> java.xml.bind
> java.xml.ws
> java.xml.ws.annotation
> jdk.httpserver
> jdk.unsupported
To create an image for your app
all JARs need to be modularized!
(Including dependencies.)
$ jlink
--output jdk
--module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods:mods
--add-modules advent
# services are not resolves automatically
--add-modules factory.surprise,factory.chocolate
Launching the app:
jdk/bin/java -module advent
You can even create a launcher:
$ jlink
--output jdk
--module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods:mods
--add-modules advent,...
# --launcher <name>=<module>[/<mainclass>]
--launcher calendar=advent
Launching the app:
jdk/bin/calendar
--bind-services
: link in all service providers
--limit-modules
: limit universe of observable mods
--no-header-files
: exclude include header files
--no-man-pages
: exclude man pages
--strip-debug
: strip debug information
You can use jlink
to:
create a runtime image
with just the right classes
create a runtime image
including your code
This should make certain kinds of deploys
smaller and easier.
⇜ Get my book!
You can hire me:
training (Java 8/9, JUnit 5)
consulting (Java 8/9)
puzzle-people: Kevin Dooley (CC-BY 2.0)
binary-code: Christiaan Colen (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
ball-of-mud-2: Andi Gentsch (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
jar-hell: Wellcome Library, London (CC-BY 4.0)
flag-amsterdam: George Rex (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
puzzle-cubed: David Singleton (CC-BY 2.0)
puzzle-piece-green:
StockMonkeys.com
(CC-BY 2.0)
puzzle-pieces-put-together:
Ken Teegardin
(CC-BY-SA 2.0)
iceberg:
NOAA’s National Ocean Service
(CC-BY 2.0)
class and module diagrams:
Nicolai Parlog
(CC-BY-NC 4.0)
keep-out: Brian Smithson (CC-BY 2.0)
garbage-only: Peter Kaminski (CC-BY 2.0)
golden-gate: Nicolas Raymond (CC-BY 2.0)
confusion: Procsilas Moscas (CC-BY 2.0)
module diagrams:
Nicolai Parlog
(CC-BY-NC 4.0)
broken-glass:
Eric Schmuttenmaer
(CC-BY-SA 2.0)
internals: David French (CC-BY 2.0)
cut: Jinx! (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
cells: Jonathan Lin (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
obsolete: Trevor King (CC-BY 2.0)
sign: Duncan Harris (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
question-mark: Milos Milosevic (CC-BY 2.0)
bundles: Danumurthi Mahendra (CC-BY 2.0)